Hedge fund COMAC Capital, the $5.2 billion macro fund run by Colm O’Shea, is bracing for a fresh round of turmoil in European markets, people familiar with the fund said, and is sticking to its bearish strategy despite losing out in this year’s rally.

London-based COMAC, down more than 5 percent in the period up to mid-March this year, believes the flood of cheap central bank cash into parched markets is only a temporary fix for Europe’s ills, and masks the region’s poor economic prospects, these people said.

Most hedge funds are returning to winning ways in 2012 thanks to the rally in equity and bond markets and a bullish stance. The average hedge fund has risen 5.03 percent from the start of the year up to March 15, according to the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index. Bullish funds have benefited from the European Central Bank’s one trillion-euro cash injection into the financial system and greater confidence that policymakers have finally stopped the Euro zone debt crisis from spiraling further out of control.

But some macro funds are positioning themselves for a new downturn in Europe, at the same time as they see an improved economic outlook for the U.S. Many have bought options linked to volatility, which will rise in price if there is a resumption of the panic that racked markets for most of 2011, people familiar with the sector said.

“A lot of these funds think all this quantitative easing is just a temporary fix and the underlying problems are still there,” one of the macro-investors said.

Macro funds make money by wagering how economic trends will play out across asset classes including in rates, currencies, commodities and equities, and are among the best-known. Well-known funds in the sector include Brevan Howard, Moore Capital Management and Tudor Investment, as well as George Soros‘ Quantum Fund, where Mr. O’Shea used to work as a macro trader.

COMAC has made several successful calls in the past. It returned 5 percent in 2011 compared with a fall of more than 5 percent booked by the average fund. It has returned an annualized profit of upwards of 8 percent since its 2005 inception, data seen by Reuters shows.

Mr. O’Shea, who read economics at the University of Cambridge, also performed well in 2008 after several successful bets including one on falling U.S. interest rates.

Source:Reuters

According to its web site, COMAC invests across global markets to try and capture “directional market movements that commonly have a strong fundamental reasoning based upon economic and political analysis.”

Investors looking for protection against volatile and uncertain markets have made macro funds among the most popular strategies this year. In a recent survey conducted by Credit Suisse, investors said macro was the most sought-after strategy in 2012, while also predicting that they would be the best performing.

GlobeOp Financial Services (GO.L) is in talks with private equity firms Advent International Corporation and TPG over possible takeover offers, as the hedge fund services firm carries out a strategic review to try and boost its share price.

The London and New York-based firm, which has $173 billion in client assets under administration and which last month said it was encouraged by net inflows, said the talks have come after it appointed Evercore Partners to advise on a review.

The firm has formed an independent committee to conduct discussions as some directors may take part in an offer.

Talks are still at a preliminary stage, GlobeOp added.

Shares in GlobeOp, which publishes monthly updates of client flows and redemption requests, have fallen from more than 440 pence last July to below 300 pence at Thursday’s close.

The company had a market cap of 312 million pounds as at close of trading on Thursday, Thomson Reuters data showed.

“GlobeOp is performing extremely well and we are confident of continuing the strong growth of the business under our current ownership structure,” said GlobeOp chairman Ed Nicoll in a statement.

“Nevertheless, the board felt it right to explore options which could enhance the interests of clients, employees and shareholders.”

Source: Reuters

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an emergency request to put its securities fraud lawsuit against Citigroup Inc. on hold so it can quickly appeal a judge’s decision to reject its proposed settlement with the bank.

In a court filing, the SEC said the urgency came after U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff in a teleconference this month directed Citigroup to address its charges by Jan.  nearly one month sooner than federal rules require.

Mr. Rakoff on Nov. 28 had harshly rejected the proposed $285 million settlement, saying the SEC’s failure to require the New York-based bank to admit or deny its charges left him no way to know whether the settlement was adequate.

But the SEC said the ruling was “legal error,” at odds with decades of court decisions allowing such settlements and letting investors get faster recoveries, and could affect its ability to reach similar accords with other companies.

In its Tuesday [Dec. 27] filing with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, the SEC it faced potential irreparable harm if Citigroup were forced by Jan. 3 to “answer” its complaint, 27 days sooner than federal rules require. An answer can force Citigroup to deny some or all of the SEC allegations, or seek to dismiss the case entirely.

But doing so would force the SEC to devote substantial resources to the case and “disrupt a central negotiated provision of the consent judgment pursuant to which Citigroup agreed not to deny the allegations,” the regulator said.

“The parties will not be able to return to their initial bargaining positions should this court ultimately reverse the district court,” the SEC added.

The SEC said Citigroup has agreed to its request to put the case on hold and allow an expedited appeal.

Announced on Oct. 19, the settlement was intended to resolve charges that Citigroup sold $1 billion of risky mortgage-linked securities in 2007, without telling investors that it was betting against the debt. Investors lost more than $700 million, the SEC has estimated.

The $285 million payment was to include $160 million of disgorged profit and fees, $30 million of interest and a $95 million civil fine. Mr. Rakoff called the penalty “pocket change” for Citigroup, the third-largest U.S. bank.

But the SEC has said the law limits the sums it can recover. It has asked Congress for authority to seek larger penalties in corporate cases.

Mr. Rakoff has set a July 16, 2012, trial date. One Citigroup employee, director Brian Stoker, was also charged by the SEC, and has been contesting those charges.

The case is SEC v Citigroup Global Markets Inc., case No. 11-05227, in 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Source: Reuters